Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Weller's avatar

God bless you for writing this ambitious poem! its incredible! parts like v were reminding me of pound and what i like in pound, the gravitas and courage. ive been coming back to read this again periodically the past few days and will probably return. there is spiritual depth in this poem and its edifying and inspiring. i thank you heartily!

Expand full comment
Power Lines's avatar

An interesting morning read! After a quick first pass, I just want to jot down some notes:

* The major mode of the New Testament (clipped narrative, earthy but hard to resolve anecdote) is apparent here.

* So are the modes of the modernists, Pound and Eliot, the montage of different styles and the academic source eclecticism. Your take is more contained, for obvious reasons--more Christian, more orthodox, and also just cleaner and more approachable.

* The choice of theme--asceticism--is ambitious. I think in our civilization the tradition of self-denial is especially odd, especially self-denial as mental exploration, rather than social utility. It's freaky.

* It's a reminder that the whole lyric tradition of listening to yourselves and playing with our minds is part of a much larger, usually religious tradition. And that it is not a very safe one. It might lead to madness, for instance.

* Secular takes on the theme--Bidart in Ellen West (anorexia), and Rilke (Duino Elegies, intense, elegant world-hatred) are few and far between. But those examples are very powerful and disturbing.

* This poem in contrast, by being embedded in a tradition of a particular long-ago historical figure, seems less threatening. And the emphasis is more on finding God than finding God by denying the world and the self. The negative theology (it's here because it's not here) is more Stevens than visceral.

These are just first impressions I wanted to capture. I'll do another read this wknd. Thank you putting this our there. Intriguing!

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts